Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rice straw mulch improved growth, yield attributes and production efficiency relative to no mulch.

A claim from Studies on mulching and weed management in unpuddled transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch improved growth, yield attributes and production efficiency relative to no mulch.

Treatment
rice straw mulche0
Outcome
growth attributes, yield attributes and production efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no mulchinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–88
e0

“cover crop of Sesbania followed by surface mulch followed by green mulch and rice straw mulch recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes and production efficiency as compared to no mulching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–804

Title

Studies on mulching and weed management in unpuddled transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Sneha Kumari; Manoj Kumar Singh; Sripriya Das International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4ap.10173

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-69eed2385697ea7d831ef08b0f4440e5b56e9794b9dceaeec9193f1726dad451 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

organic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

327 papers: 279 positive, 48 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this claim · 37 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Wheat straw incorporation reduced mean rice yield by 7% against straw removal.

    Long‐Term Effects of Organic Inputs on Yield and Soil Fertility in the Rice–Wheat Rotation · 2004 · compared with WS removal

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Straw incorporation decreased rice grain yield in all three fields.

    Methane emission from rice fields as influenced by solar radiation, temperature, and straw incorporation · 1991

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Nutrient combinations did not affect soil exchangeable K, plant height, or harvest index.

    Organic Amendments Boost Soil Fertility and Rice Productivity and Reduce Methane Emissions from Paddy Fields under Sub-Tropical Conditions · 2021

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Organic amendments with flooding injured rice yield.

    Influence of Organic Additions and Flooding on Iron and Manganese Uptake by Rice1 · 1957

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Straw raised yield-scaled emissions 27.8% in single rice.

    Integrated Effects of Straw Incorporation and N Application on Rice Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Three Rice-Based Cropping Systems · 2024 · compared with NS

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Non-flooded straw mulching (SM) decreased average rice yield by 11% compared with TF.

    Long‐term non‐flooded mulching cultivation influences rice productivity and soil organic carbon · 2012 · compared with TF

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Wheat straw return reduced direct-seeded rice yield.

    Differences in rice yield and biomass accumulation dynamics for different direct seeding methods after wheat straw return · 2022

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    In situ rice residue incorporation at full fertilizer had a small yield penalty.

    Residue recycling options and their implications for sustainable nitrogen management in rice–wheat agroecosystems · 2023

    Opposite direction

318 papers more in this group

See all 327 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.