Paper · 2023 · Ecological Processes

Residue recycling options and their implications for sustainable nitrogen management in rice–wheat agroecosystems

Ajay Kumar Bhardwaj; Kapil Malik; Manu Rani; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background In the Indo-Gangetic Plain, rice–wheat is the most extensively practiced crop rotation. The escalating issue of crop residue burning, particularly rice straw, and the necessity to lower the exorbitant expenses associated with fertilizer inputs stand out as significant challenges for farmers in the region. A well-suited integrated nutrient management (INM) strategy that focuses on recycling crop residues can serve as a solution to address these issues. Such a strategy not only mitigates air pollution resulting from residue burning but also helps combat water pollution due to nitrate losses from agroecosystems. Field experiments were used to evaluate the suitability of eight INM-modules that included various combinations of inorganic fertilizer rates (50%, 100%, 150% of recommended dose), crop residues (wheat and rice stubble retention at 30 cm standing stubble equivalent to 1/3 the straw yield), rice straw compost (RSC), farmyard manure (FYM), and green manuring (GM), compared to 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (F) and no fertilizer application. Results There was a considerable improvement in nitrogen mineralization, grain yields, and nitrogen use efficiency under GM + RSC-F50 and GM + FYM-F50. These INM modules would permit a 50% reduction in the use of chemical fertilizers. There was a little yield penalty with in situ rice residue incorporation at 100% F; however, this could be overcome with 150% F fertilizer application. In situ retention of wheat straw with a full application of fertilizer resulted in steadily rising crop yields over time. Changes in the redox potential, soil pH, and soil organic carbon best accounted for the observed trajectories in nitrogen use efficiency. Conclusion The most promising INM modules for adoption by farmers in the Indo-Gangetic Plain to judiciously use crop residues and curtail chemical fertilizer inputs are green manuring with Sesbania aculeata + rice straw compost at 5 t ha −1 + only 50% of recommended dose of fertilizers (GM + RSC-F50), and green manuring with Sesbania aculeata + farmyard manure at 5 t ha −1 + only 50% of recommended dose of fertilizers (GM + FYM-F50). Sole incorporation of crop residues without nitrogen augmentation from other sources might not help curtail chemical fertilizer use. Composting rice straw, which otherwise is widely burnt, proved a useful nitrogen source and a vital component of INM. Waste rice straw composting at the community scale and its application as a nutrient source can help achieve sustainable nitrogen management in the agroecosystems of Indo-Gangetic Plain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM plus rice straw compost at half fertilizer improved nitrogen mineralization, grain yields, and nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
GM + RSC-F50e0
Outcome
nitrogen mineralization, grain yields, and nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a considerable improvement in nitrogen mineralization, grain yields, and nitrogen use efficiency under GM + RSC-F50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM plus farmyard manure at half fertilizer improved nitrogen mineralization, grain yields, and nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
GM + FYM-F50e0
Outcome
nitrogen mineralization, grain yields, and nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a considerable improvement in nitrogen mineralization, grain yields, and nitrogen use efficiency under GM + RSC-F50 and GM + FYM-F50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

These modules could permit a 50% reduction in chemical fertilizer use.

Outcome
reduction in the use of chemical fertilizerse0
Value
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These INM modules would permit a 50% reduction in the use of chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In situ rice residue incorporation at full fertilizer had a small yield penalty.

Treatment
in situ rice residue incorporation at 100% Fe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
penaltye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a little yield penalty with in situ rice residue incorporation at 100% F”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer to 150% overcame the yield penalty from rice residue incorporation.

Treatment
150% F fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
yield penaltye1
Direction
overcomee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this could be overcome with 150% F fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1471 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield penalty with in situ rice residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining wheat straw with full fertilizer led to steadily rising yields over time.

Treatment
In situ retention of wheat straw with a full application of fertilizere0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
steadily risinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In situ retention of wheat straw with a full application of fertilizer resulted in steadily rising crop yields over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redox potential, soil pH, and organic carbon best accounted for nitrogen use efficiency trajectories.

Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Qualifier
redox potential, soil pH, and soil organic carbone0
Setting
soil pHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in the redox potential, soil pH, and soil organic carbon best accounted for the observed trajectories in nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1731 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend green manuring with Sesbania aculeata, rice straw compost, and half fertilizer.

Outcome
green manuring with Sesbania aculeata + rice straw compost at 5 t ha −1 + only 50% of recommended dose of fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green manuring with Sesbania aculeata + rice straw compost at 5 t ha −1 + only 50% of recommended dose of fertilizers (GM + RSC-F50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1902–2034 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend green manuring with Sesbania aculeata, farmyard manure, and half fertilizer.

Outcome
green manuring with Sesbania aculeata + farmyard manure at 5 t ha −1 + only 50% of recommended dose of fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green manuring with Sesbania aculeata + farmyard manure at 5 t ha −1 + only 50% of recommended dose of fertilizers (GM + FYM-F50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2040–2169 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Crop residue incorporation alone might not reduce chemical fertilizer use.

Outcome
Sole incorporation of crop residues without nitrogen augmentation from other sources might not help curtail chemical fertilizer usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole incorporation of crop residues without nitrogen augmentation from other sources might not help curtail chemical fertilizer use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2302 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw compost proved a useful nitrogen source for integrated nutrient management.

Outcome
a useful nitrogen source and a vital component of INMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Composting rice straw, which otherwise is widely burnt, proved a useful nitrogen source and a vital component of INM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2304–2420 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 110 positive, 14 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 128 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 281 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

organic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

327 papers: 279 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 279 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

323 papers more in this group

See all 327 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.