Paper · 2020 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effects of long-term straw return on soil organic carbon fractions and enzyme activities in a double-cropped rice paddy in South China

Wan HUANG; Jian-fu WU; Xiao-hua PAN; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
126
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Long-term straw return is an important carbon source for improving soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in croplands, and straw removal through burning is also a common practice in open fields in South China. However, the specific effects of long-term rice straw management on SOC fractions, the related enzyme activities and their relationships, and whether these effects differ between crop growing seasons remain unknown. Three treatments with equal nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium nutrient inputs, including straw/ash and chemical nutrients, were established to compare the effects of straw removal (CK), straw return (SR), and straw burned return (SBR). Compared to CK, long-term SR tended to improve the yield of early season rice (P=0.057), and significantly increased total organic carbon (TOC) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in double-cropped rice paddies. While SBR had no effect on TOC, it decreased light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) in early rice and easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC) in late rice, significantly increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and significantly decreased soil pH. These results showed that MBC was the most sensitive indicator for assessing changes of SOC in the double-cropped rice system due to long-term straw return. In addition, the different effects on SOC fraction sizes between SR and SBR were attributed to the divergent trends in most of the soil enzyme activities in the early and late rice that mainly altered DOC, while DOC was positively affected by β-xylosidase in both early and late rice. We concluded that straw return was superior to straw burned return for improving SOC fractions, but the negative effects on soil enzyme activities in late rice require further research.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term straw return tended to improve early season rice yield (P=0.057).

Treatment
long-term SRe1
Outcome
the yield of early season ricee1
Direction
tended to improvee1
Qualifier
P=0.057e1
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compared to CK, long-term SR tended to improve the yield of early season rice (P=0.057), and significantly increased total organic carbon (TOC) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in double-cropped rice paddies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term straw return significantly increased total organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon in double-cropped rice paddies.

Treatment
long-term SRe1
Outcome
total organic carbon (TOC) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC)e1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Comparator
CKe1
Setting
double-cropped rice paddiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compared to CK, long-term SR tended to improve the yield of early season rice (P=0.057), and significantly increased total organic carbon (TOC) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in double-cropped rice paddies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw burned return had no effect on total organic carbon in rice.

Treatment
SBRe2
Outcome
TOCe2
Direction
had no effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“While SBR had no effect on TOC, it decreased light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) in early rice and easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC) in late rice, significantly increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and significantly decreased soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw burned return decreased light fraction organic carbon in early rice.

Treatment
SBRe2
Outcome
light fraction organic carbon (LFOC)e2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
early ricee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“While SBR had no effect on TOC, it decreased light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) in early rice and easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC) in late rice, significantly increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and significantly decreased soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw burned return decreased easily oxidizable organic carbon in late rice.

Treatment
SBRe2
Outcome
easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC)e2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
late ricee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“While SBR had no effect on TOC, it decreased light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) in early rice and easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC) in late rice, significantly increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and significantly decreased soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw burned return significantly increased dissolved organic carbon in rice.

Treatment
SBRe2
Outcome
dissolved organic carbon (DOC)e2
Direction
significantly increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“While SBR had no effect on TOC, it decreased light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) in early rice and easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC) in late rice, significantly increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and significantly decreased soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw burned return significantly decreased soil pH in rice paddies.

Treatment
SBRe2
Outcome
soil pHe2
Direction
significantly decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“While SBR had no effect on TOC, it decreased light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) in early rice and easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC) in late rice, significantly increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and significantly decreased soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial biomass carbon was the most sensitive indicator of SOC change under long-term straw return in double-cropped rice.

Treatment
long-term straw returne3
Outcome
MBC was the most sensitive indicator for assessing changes of SOCe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“These results showed that MBC was the most sensitive indicator for assessing changes of SOC in the double-cropped rice system due to long-term straw return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1271 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The different effects of SR and SBR on SOC fraction sizes are attributed to divergent trends in most soil enzyme activities.

Outcome
the different effects on SOC fraction sizes between SR and SBRe4
Qualifier
divergent trends in most of the soil enzyme activitiese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the different effects on SOC fraction sizes between SR and SBR were attributed to the divergent trends in most of the soil enzyme activities in the early and late rice that mainly altered DOC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1477 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

β-xylosidase positively affected dissolved organic carbon in both early and late rice.

Gene
β-xylosidasee4
Outcome
DOCe4
Direction
positively affectede4
Qualifier
in both early and late ricee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“while DOC was positively affected by β-xylosidase in both early and late rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return was superior to straw burned return for improving SOC fractions in rice.

Treatment
straw returne5
Outcome
SOC fractionse5
Direction
superiore5
Comparator
straw burned returne5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“We concluded that straw return was superior to straw burned return for improving SOC fractions, but the negative effects on soil enzyme activities in late rice require further research”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1742 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw burned return had negative effects on soil enzyme activities in late rice.

Outcome
soil enzyme activitiese5
Qualifier
late ricee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the negative effects on soil enzyme activities in late rice require further research”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1742 · show in text ↑

fire · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

organic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

327 papers: 279 positive, 48 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

323 papers more in this group

See all 327 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.