Paper · 2023 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Long-Term Organic Amendment Application Improves Soil Fertility Status, Nutrient Accumulation and Crop Productivity Under Rice-Wheat Cropping System

Shivani Ranjan; Sanjay Kumar; Swaraj Kumar Dutta; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The major issue in modern agriculture is long-term sustainability. Nutrient management by integrating organic manures and inorganic fertilizers may play a vital role in improving and sustaining crop productivity. A long-term field experiment (since 1984) comprising 11 treatments with different combinations of inorganic and organic fertilizers such as farm yard manure (FYM), wheat cut straw (WCS) and Dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata L.) as green manure (GM) was conducted to evaluate their effects on crop yield, nutrient accumulation and soil fertility status under a rice – wheat cropping system. The maximum grain yield of wheat was recorded in T6, i.e. 50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 50% nitrogen through FYM in rice and 100% RDF in wheat (4291 kg ha−1) as compared to chemically fertilized plots T5, i.e. 100% RDF in both rice and wheat (3441 kg ha−1). The application of organic manures in combination with chemical fertilizers reduced soil pH and bulk density from 7.40 to 7.23 and 1.49 to 1.37 g cm−3, respectively. Soil organic carbon (SOC), available soil nutrients and nutrient accumulation by crop were higher in integrated nutrient management-treated plots as compared to control. A positive and significant correlation was observed between SOC and available soil nitrogen (r = 0.987), phosphorus (r = 0.913) and potassium (r = 0.921). The results clearly suggest that integrated use of chemical fertilizers and organic manures on a long-term basis improves soil fertility and crop productivity with the potential to enhance soil sustainability

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated T6 treatment gave wheat grain yield of 4291 kg ha−1 versus 3441 kg ha−1 under chemical fertilizer alone.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 50% nitrogen through FYM in rice and 100% RDF in wheate0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4291 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
3441 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
100% RDF in both rice and wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain yield of wheat was recorded in T6, i.e. 50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 50% nitrogen through FYM in rice and 100% RDF in wheat (4291 kg ha−1) as compared to chemically fertilized plots T5, i.e. 100% RDF in both rice and wheat (3441 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures combined with chemical fertilizers lowered soil pH from 7.40 to 7.23.

Taxon
Rice-Wheatt0
Treatment
organic manures in combination with chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.40 to 7.23e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of organic manures in combination with chemical fertilizers reduced soil pH and bulk density from 7.40 to 7.23 and 1.49 to 1.37 g cm−3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures combined with chemical fertilizers lowered soil bulk density from 1.49 to 1.37 g cm−3.

Taxon
Rice-Wheatt0
Treatment
organic manures in combination with chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.49 to 1.37 g cm−3e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of organic manures in combination with chemical fertilizers reduced soil pH and bulk density from 7.40 to 7.23 and 1.49 to 1.37 g cm−3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management increased soil organic carbon and available nutrients relative to control.

Taxon
Rice-Wheatt0
Treatment
integrated nutrient management-treated plotse0
Outcome
Soil organic carbon (SOC), available soil nutrientse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic carbon (SOC), available soil nutrients and nutrient accumulation by crop were higher in integrated nutrient management-treated plots as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management increased crop nutrient accumulation relative to control.

Taxon
Rice-Wheatt0
Treatment
integrated nutrient management-treated plotse0
Outcome
nutrient accumulation by crope0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic carbon (SOC), available soil nutrients and nutrient accumulation by crop were higher in integrated nutrient management-treated plots as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–148 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOC correlated positively with available soil nitrogen (r = 0.987).

Taxon
Rice-Wheatt0
Compound
SOCe0
Outcome
available soil nitrogene0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.987e0

Verbatim

e0

“A positive and significant correlation was observed between SOC and available soil nitrogen (r = 0.987), phosphorus (r = 0.913) and potassium (r = 0.921)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–148 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOC correlated positively with available soil phosphorus (r = 0.913).

Taxon
Rice-Wheatt0
Compound
SOCe0
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.913e0

Verbatim

e0

“A positive and significant correlation was observed between SOC and available soil nitrogen (r = 0.987), phosphorus (r = 0.913) and potassium (r = 0.921)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–148 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOC correlated positively with available soil potassium (r = 0.921).

Taxon
Rice-Wheatt0
Compound
SOCe0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.921e0

Verbatim

e0

“A positive and significant correlation was observed between SOC and available soil nitrogen (r = 0.987), phosphorus (r = 0.913) and potassium (r = 0.921)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–148 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.