Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Agar was better than perlite and sand for root elongation of apple rootstocks.

A claim from COMMERCIALLY FEASIBLE PROTOCOL FOR ROOTING AND ACCLIMATIZATION OF MICROPROPAGATED APPLE ROOTSTOCKS · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agar was better than perlite and sand for root elongation of apple rootstocks.

Treatment
agare3
Outcome
root elongatione3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
perlite and sande3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tissue culture raised apple rootstocks of 'Malling' series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–159
e3

“Among various substrates tested for root elongation, agar was found better than perlite and sand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–422

Title

COMMERCIALLY FEASIBLE PROTOCOL FOR ROOTING AND ACCLIMATIZATION OF MICROPROPAGATED APPLE ROOTSTOCKS

M. Modgil; T. Sharma; M. Thakur Acta Horticulturae 2009. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2009.839.25

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-6b34f908bfa4f8097f4218449f4d13b2ca59977de6b67830fade888083c9a211 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

agar · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.