Method / resourcemodel-written summary

Three isozyme systems could not uniquely fingerprint all G. augusta accessions.

A claim from A COMPARISON OF GARDENIA AUGUSTA CULTIVARS USING ISOZYMES AND RAPD MARKERS · 2008

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three isozyme systems could not uniquely fingerprint all G. augusta accessions.

Taxon
G. augustaGardenia jasminoidese0
Outcome
uniquely fingerprint all of the G. augusta accessionse0
Comparator
the three enzyme systemse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gardenia jasminoides
Gardenia jasminoides · TaxonAlpsdake · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the three enzyme systems were not sufficient to uniquely fingerprint all of the G. augusta accessions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1291

Title

A COMPARISON OF GARDENIA AUGUSTA CULTIVARS USING ISOZYMES AND RAPD MARKERS

R.A. Criley; M.S. Roh; M. Kikuchi; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2008. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2008.766.62

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-6d2cbd2e762f73a4cac1bba6d14247e5eb1f5d7ac5f397ed93819f07174484b4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer