Intervention effectmodel-written summary

0.4% ATS did not reduce branch or tree yields versus normally hand-thinned controls.

A claim from BLOSSOM THINNING OF `WENATCHEE' AND `TILTON' APRICOTS WITH AMMONIUM THIOSULPHATE · 1993

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.4% ATS did not reduce branch or tree yields versus normally hand-thinned controls.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
0.4%e0
Outcome
branch and tree yieldse0
Direction
did not reducee0
Comparator
control trees hand-thinned at the normal timee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.4% and 0.5% ATS reduced hand-thinning time by at least one-third, increased fruit size by about 20%, and did not reduce branch and tree yields compared to control trees hand-thinned at the normal time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–554
t0

“apricot”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–52

Title

BLOSSOM THINNING OF `WENATCHEE' AND `TILTON' APRICOTS WITH AMMONIUM THIOSULPHATE

Norman E. Looney; Michael A. Beulah HortScience 1993. doi:10.21273/hortsci.28.5.484e

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-6d860b9fee82f7040ea8fd2c29f75968bcaf74044accd3c9e8575af053c2f38d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer