Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Integrated nutrient management gave the highest sunflower stalk yield.

A claim from Effect of Continuous Fertilization on Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Maize and Sunflower in Red Calcareous Soil (Typic Haplustalf) under Permanent Manurial Experiment · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management gave the highest sunflower stalk yield.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
INM practicee0
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“INM practice recorded the highest stalk yield in sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1073
t0

“Effect of Continuous Fertilization on Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Maize and Sunflower in Red Calcareous Soil (Typic Haplustalf) under Permanent Manurial Experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–164
t1

“Effect of Continuous Fertilization on Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Maize and Sunflower in Red Calcareous Soil (Typic Haplustalf) under Permanent Manurial Experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–164

Title

Effect of Continuous Fertilization on Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Maize and Sunflower in Red Calcareous Soil (Typic Haplustalf) under Permanent Manurial Experiment

Elayarajan M; Sathya S; Arulmozhiselvan K Madras Agricultural Journal 2013. doi:10.29321/maj.10.001326

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-6e24015a7bf04feb44abf854c9a91625a885bc8710ebce1342499a19082592e1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

365 papers: 344 positive, 21 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

356 papers more in this group

See all 365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.