Claim · model-written summary
Grazed crops had delayed phenological development.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- grazede0
- Outcome
- phenological developmente0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grazed crops had delayed phenological development”
t0“winter wheat”
Title
Matthew T. Harrison; John R. Evans; Hugh Dove; et al. Crop and Pasture Science 2011. doi:10.1071/cp11235
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Grazing reduced LAI, light interception, and growth rates by up to 90%.
- Intervention effect Grazing did not affect overall RUE.
- Intervention effect Grazing significantly reduced cumulative light interception and total dry matter accumulation.
- Intervention effect Grazing did not affect grain yields.
- Intervention effect Grazing increased partitioning of shoot dry matter to spikes.
- Intervention effect Grazing reduced stem dry matter accumulation.
- Intervention effect Grazing decreased stem assimilate available for retranslocation to kernels by up to 75%.
- Intervention effect Grazing prolonged green area duration after anthesis.
- Intervention effect Grazing increased assimilate supply from current photosynthesis to developing kernels.