Grazing reduced stem dry matter accumulation.

grazing · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

1. positive
   Grazing 40 DSE/ha for 19 days increased wheat grain yield from 2.30 to 2.88 t/ha in a dry-spring season.

   Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use · 2006 · compared with non-grazed crops

   Opposite directionCited by this paper

2. positive
   Winter wheat biomass production was greater with shorter than with longer grazing durations, irrespective of grazing intensity.

   Recovery dynamics of rainfed winter wheat after livestock grazing 1. Growth rates, grain yields, soil water use and water-use efficiency · 2011 · compared with longer grazing durations

   Opposite directionCites this paperCited by this paper

3. negative
   Three-year-average wheat grain yields were 4.79, 4.79, 4.29, 3.70, 3.20 and 2.40 Mg ha-1 dry weight for grain-only and the 1 February, 6 March, 17 March, 31 March and 13 April grazing termination dates, respectively.

   Grazing Duration Effects on Wheat Growth and Grain Yield¹ · 1987 · compared with ungrazed

   Same directionCited by this paper

4. positive
   Grazing pearl millet increased wheat standing dry matter yield by 25±14%.

   Crop and cattle responses to tillage systems for integrated crop–livestock production in the Southern Piedmont, USA · 2007 · compared with allowing it to accumulate as surface residue

   Opposite direction

5. positive
   Grazed forage phases maintained high yields with lower herbicide and fertilizer applications.

   Livestock in diverse cropping systems improve weed management and sustain yields whilst reducing inputs · 2018

   Opposite direction

6. positive
   Nematodes with weaker grazing intensity gave better plant performance of wheat than nematodes with greater grazing intensity.

   Nematodes and their bacterial prey improve phosphorus acquisition by wheat · 2022 · compared with nematodes with greater grazing intensity

   Opposite direction

7. positive
   Increasing grazing pressure from low to high increased beef production by 107 kg per hectare.

   Grazing Pressure on Beef and Grain Production of Dual‐Purpose Wheat in Argentina · 2003 · compared with low

   Opposite direction

8. positive
   Grazing a wheat crop could be more profitable 40–75% of the time on poorer soil types in lower rainfall environments under average commodity prices.

   Sacrificial grazing of wheat crops: identifying tactics and opportunities in Western Australia’s grainbelt using simulation approaches · 2009

   Opposite direction

61 papers more in this group