Claim · model-written summary
CID-II decreased rice percent of filled grains.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“the percent of filled grains (PFG) and spikelets per m 2 (SPM) decreased under this irrigation scheme.”
t0“Paddy Rice”
e1“CID-II obtained marginally”
Title
Shi-Kai Gao International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2018. doi:10.17957/ijab/15.0503
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect CID increased rice plant height relative to AWD.
- Intervention effect CID significantly decreased rice tiller number relative to AWD.
- Intervention effect CID reduced irrigation water volume by 9.7%-37.1%.
- Intervention effect CID increased rice yield irrigation water use efficiency by 14.6%-51.5%.
- Intervention effect CID-I reduced grain yield by 2.9% in 2015.
- Intervention effect CID-I increased grain yield by 3.5% in 2016.
- Intervention effect CID-II had a nonsignificantly lower rice yield than AWD, by 4.7% in 2015.
- Intervention effect CID-II had a nonsignificantly lower rice yield than AWD, by 2.0% in the year stated as 2015.
- Intervention effect CID-II decreased rice spikelets per m 2.
- Intervention effect CID significantly increased rice yield irrigation water use efficiency relative to AWD.
- Intervention effect CID significantly increased rice biomass irrigation water use efficiency relative to AWD.
- Intervention effect CID-II gave the highest rice yield irrigation water use efficiency.
- Intervention effect CID-II gave the highest rice biomass irrigation water use efficiency.
- Recommendation The authors recommend CID with a 500 mm lower irrigation limit and 200 mm ponding depth where water is inadequate and costly.