Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CID significantly increased rice biomass irrigation water use efficiency relative to AWD.

A claim from Effect of Different Controlled Irrigation and Drainage Regimes on Crop Growth and Water Use in Paddy Rice · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CID significantly increased rice biomass irrigation water use efficiency relative to AWD.

Taxon
paddy ricet0
Treatment
CIDe0
Outcome
biomass irrigation water use efficiency (IWUEb)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
AWDe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“IWUEy and biomass irrigation water use efficiency (IWUEb) were significantly higher under CID than under AWD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1253
t0

“Paddy Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–105

Title

Effect of Different Controlled Irrigation and Drainage Regimes on Crop Growth and Water Use in Paddy Rice

Shi-Kai Gao International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2018. doi:10.17957/ijab/15.0503

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e0b32e10ffba607b395221211099fb1f28ef56b262c94990d0d082b7cde808d3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Water-saving irrigation reduced irrigation water by 24.5% to 29.2%.

    Water‐Saving and High‐Yielding Irrigation for Lowland Rice by Controlling Limiting Values of Soil Water Potential · 2007 · compared with conventional irrigation

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Intermittent irrigation reduced irrigation water use by 22 to 76%.

    Rice Water Use Efficiency and Yield under Continuous and Intermittent Irrigation · 2015

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Seven days without irrigation produced flag leaf water potentials of −1.7 and −2.0 MPa in the two cultivars.

    Sensitivity of Pollination to Water Deficits at Anthesis in Upland Rice · 1990

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    All varieties responded similarly to direct seeding and different AWD levels, with non-significant differences in grain yield and water productivity.

    Growth, yield and water productivity of selected lowland Thai rice varieties under different cultivation methods and alternate wetting and drying irrigation · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Water levels did not affect weekly leaf chlorophyll content and relative water content.

    Effects of Water Stress on Rice Production: Bioavailability of Potassium in Soil · 2013

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Water productivity did not differ significantly among irrigation regimes.

    Water Productivity and Harvest Index Response of Paddy Rice with Alternate Wetting and Drying Practice for Adaptation to Climate Change · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Conventional irrigation had the highest use of irrigation water (912±12.5 mm) in rice.

    Role of Short-Term Weather Forecast Horizon in Irrigation Scheduling and Crop Water Productivity of Rice · 2021

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Relative water content and soluble protein content were significantly higher under flooded condition than under drip and micro sprinkler irrigation in aerobic rice.

    Effect of Micro-irrigation Technique on Physiological and Yield Traits in Aerobic Rice · 2010 · compared with flooded condition

    Opposite direction

371 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.