Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pst did not induce localised GUS staining at infection sites in ZmUbi-GUS wheat.

A claim from Pathogen Species-Specific Differences in Induction of the Maize Polyubiquitin Gene Promoter in Transgenic Wheat · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pst did not induce localised GUS staining at infection sites in ZmUbi-GUS wheat.

Treatment
pathogen challengede6
Interactor
Pste5pathogen
Outcome
localised GUS staining at infection sitese5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“ZmUbi-GUS transgenic wheat plants were also pathogen challenged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1160
e5

“unlike Pst, both Pgt and Pt induced localised GUS staining at infection sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1243

Title

Pathogen Species-Specific Differences in Induction of the Maize Polyubiquitin Gene Promoter in Transgenic Wheat

Saeid Babaei; Neil Smith; Chunhong Chen; et al. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 2026. doi:10.1094/mpmi-12-25-0174-r

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-719fa5266aab350437b667610032c4ef4920f033187472ebf65f3aa956ee5b33 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer