Claim · model-written summary
No till soybean yielded more than reduced and conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- NTe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- greatere1
- Value
- 2.6e0
- Comparator
- RT and CTe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under NT than RT and CT (2.6 vs. 2.4 Mg ha −1 )”
t0“soybean”
e1“Soybean grain yield was greater”
Title
Crop rotation and tillage impact yield performance of soybean, sorghum, and wheat
Luana M. Simão; Dallas Peterson; Kraig L. Roozeboom; et al. Agronomy Journal 2022. doi:10.1002/agj2.21237
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Rotation outyielded continuous cropping, especially with no tillage.
- Intervention effect No till continuous cropping reduced yield stability in most systems.
- Observation Wheat yielded and remained stable similarly across most treatments.
- Intervention effect No till continuous wheat had the lowest grain yield.
- Intervention effect No till continuous wheat had the lowest yield stability.
- Intervention effect Rotation increased soybean yield relative to continuous soybean, 2.7 versus 2.0 Mg ha −1.
- Observation Soybean after wheat suited low yielding environments.
- Observation Soybean after sorghum suited high yielding environments.
- Intervention effect Sorghum under no till soybean sorghum rotation had greatest yield of 6.2 Mg ha −1.
- Intervention effect Sorghum under no till soybean sorghum rotation had greatest yield stability.