Intervention effectmodel-written summary

100% RDF gave highest mean gross return for maize.

A claim from Augmenting crop residue and nutrient management for sustainable maize-mustard cropping system · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF gave highest mean gross return for maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹ 149.2e0
Comparator
100% RDN and P with 50% RDKe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize-mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77
e0

“the 100% RDF treatment yielded the highest mean gross return (₹ 149.2 and 70.22 × 103/ha), net return (₹ 104.7 and 37.8 × 103/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (2.35 and 1.18) followed by 100% RDN and P with 50% RDK for maize and mustard, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–2020

Title

Augmenting crop residue and nutrient management for sustainable maize-mustard cropping system

Akhilesh Kumar Lakra; KL Nandeha; GK Shrivastava; et al. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research 2024. doi:10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i9c.2136

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-7287c3aa3e312abf2b9c320f86deaa8943ac02b23098b64397a888195c1fee2f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this claim · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.