Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The I7 irrigation schedule gave the maximum grain yield, 2669 kg ha−1, but was on par with the I5 and I6 schedules.

A claim from Effect of irrigation scheduling on the growth and yield of wheat genotypes · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I7 irrigation schedule gave the maximum grain yield, 2669 kg ha−1, but was on par with the I5 and I6 schedules.

Treatment
I7 irrigation schedulee2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
2669 kg ha−1e2
Qualifier
on par with I5 (2463 kg ha−1) and I6 (2580 kg ha−1)e3
Setting
Dharwad (Karnataka)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of irrigation schedules and genotypes on the growth and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka) in the year 2001–02”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–235
e2

“I7 irrigation schedule resulted in maximum grain yield (2669 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–785
e3

“but was on par with I5 (2463 kg ha−1) and I6 (2580 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–926

Title

Effect of irrigation scheduling on the growth and yield of wheat genotypes

Afzal Ahmad; Ramesh Kumar Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal 2015. doi:10.5958/0976-0547.2015.00045.2

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-72af2e9afcfd087f8e9391a6fe40d08590884788d881ed64aba194e46aea985b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.