Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same greater reduction from 67% than 33% defoliation appeared in 1993.

A claim from Yield and Quality Response of Muskmelon to Simulated Storm Damage · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same greater reduction from 67% than 33% defoliation appeared in 1993.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
67% defoliatione1
Outcome
marketable yields and fruit numbere1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
in 1993e0
Comparator
33% defoliatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend existed in 1993.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–553
e1

“In 1994, 67% defoliation significantly reduced marketable yields and fruit number more than did 33% defoliation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–521
t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39

Title

Yield and Quality Response of Muskmelon to Simulated Storm Damage

Michael E. Bartolo; Frank C. Schweissing HortScience 1998. doi:10.21273/hortsci.33.1.0034

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-72bdca3d3bbffd8101f3ce9ce36c2660a92cde89f9dcffcd109d2c683c20b2ad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.