Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grafting had no significant effect on fruit sting, fruit colour or fruit water content of cucumber.

A claim from Effects of Different Rootstocks on the Growth,Yield and Quality of Cucumber Fruits · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting had no significant effect on fruit sting, fruit colour or fruit water content of cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
graftede3
Outcome
fruit sting,fruit color,fruit water contente3
Direction
no significant differencese3
Comparator
ungrafted plantse3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth,yield and quality of cucumber fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–135
e3

“There were no significant differences in growth rate,individual plant yield,plot yield,fruit length,fruit width,fruit stalk length,fruit sting,fruit color,fruit water content,fruit shape index,flavor,taste,fruit soluble sugar content and free amino content between grafted and ungrafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–771

Title

Effects of Different Rootstocks on the Growth,Yield and Quality of Cucumber Fruits

Zhu Jin; Bie Zhilong; Rong Xu; et al. Huazhong Nongye Daxue xuebao 2006

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-735ec3bb5d16fc08d4e3bafc4d18ed571245c77555c419299628c60c538a670c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

grafting · quality: postharvest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.