Abstract
When growing herbaceous vegetable crops in the world practice, great importance is given to the use of grafting method. The development of environmentally safe methods to increase the yield and resistance of plants to adverse growing conditions is very relevant in vegetable production. One such method in pumpkin crops is grafting. The aim of our work was to study the effect of domestic pumpkin rootstock on growth, development and yield characteristics of cucumber hybrid using grafting method. Grafting on pumpkin species improved the growth and development of plants depending on the rootstock, compared with rootstock plants. The aim of our research was to study the influence of domestic pumpkin rootstock on the growth, development and yield characteristics of the cucumber hybrid (scion). As a scion, the variety (Asylum), recommended for cultivation in protected ground conditions, was used, which was grafted on five domestic rootstocks: 1 (Mozoleevskaya 10), 2 (Karina), 3 (Aphrodite), 4 (Mindalnaya) and Russian selection 5 (Stofuntovaya) pumpkins from vegetable and melon crops. According to the generally accepted method, the graft was grafted (cucumber Asylum) on the rootstocks of pumpkin. Using a sample of pumpkin 1 (Mozoleevskaya 10), flowering began on the fifth day earlier in comparison with non-grafted plants, and when grafting on a sample of pumpkin 4 (Aphrodite), the fruit ripened earlier by six days. To get the greatest increase in early productivity by 30%, it is possible to use both rootstocks. A significant increase in total yield was provided by samples of rootstocks 2 (Karina) – 3.9 kg/m2 and 3 (Stofuntovaya) - 8.0 kg/m2. The grafted cucumber plants with all the rootstocks used were superior to the root ones in height, in terms of the percentage of marketability of fruits and in terms of fruit weight. At the beginning of fruiting on grafted cucumber plants, the number of female flowers increased depending on the sample. In all grafted plants, the dry matter content in the fruit increased significantly. Because of our research, rootstocks 2 (Karina) and 3 (Stofuntovaya) were noted, which are recommended for use in further research breeding work and the production of grafted plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting on pumpkin rootstocks improved cucumber growth and development.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0 - Treatment
- Grafting on pumpkin speciese0
- Outcome
- growth and developmente0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- rootstock plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grafting on pumpkin species improved the growth and development of plants depending on the rootstock, compared with rootstock plants”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Mozoleevskaya 10 rootstock advanced flowering by five days relative to nongrafted plants.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Material
- Mozoleevskaya 10e0
- Treatment
- pumpkin 1 (Mozoleevskaya 10)e0
- Outcome
- floweringe0
- Direction
- earliere0
- Value
- fifth daye0
- Comparator
- non-grafted plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pumpkin 1 (Mozoleevskaya 10), flowering began on the fifth day earlier in comparison with non-grafted plants”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Aphrodite rootstock advanced fruit ripening by six days.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Material
- Aphroditee0
- Treatment
- pumpkin 4 (Aphrodite)e0
- Outcome
- fruit ripenede0
- Direction
- earliere0
- Value
- six dayse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pumpkin 4 (Aphrodite), the fruit ripened earlier by six days”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
The two rootstocks could increase early productivity by 30%.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- both rootstockse0
- Outcome
- early productivitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 30%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“greatest increase in early productivity by 30%, it is possible to use both rootstocks”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Karina rootstock significantly increased total yield to 3.9 kg/m2.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Material
- Karinae0
- Treatment
- rootstocks 2 (Karina)e0
- Outcome
- total yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 3.9 kg/m2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant increase in total yield was provided by samples of rootstocks 2 (Karina) – 3.9 kg/m2”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Stofuntovaya rootstock significantly increased total yield to 8.0 kg/m2.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Material
- Stofuntovayae0
- Treatment
- 3 (Stofuntovaya)e0
- Outcome
- total yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 8.0 kg/m2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant increase in total yield was provided by samples of rootstocks 2 (Karina) – 3.9 kg/m2 and 3 (Stofuntovaya) - 8.0 kg/m2”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber plants exceeded rooted plants in height.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- all the rootstocks usede0
- Outcome
- heighte0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- root onese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grafted cucumber plants with all the rootstocks used were superior to the root ones in height, in terms of the percentage of marketability of fruits and in terms of fruit weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber plants exceeded rooted plants in fruit marketability.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- all the rootstocks usede0
- Outcome
- percentage of marketability of fruitse0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- root onese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grafted cucumber plants with all the rootstocks used were superior to the root ones in height, in terms of the percentage of marketability of fruits and in terms of fruit weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber plants exceeded rooted plants in fruit weight.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- all the rootstocks usede0
- Outcome
- fruit weighte0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- root onese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grafted cucumber plants with all the rootstocks used were superior to the root ones in height, in terms of the percentage of marketability of fruits and in terms of fruit weight”
Claim · model-written summary
The number of female flowers increased at the start of fruiting on grafted plants.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- graftede0
- Outcome
- number of female flowerse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the beginning of fruiting on grafted cucumber plants, the number of female flowers increased depending on the sample”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit dry matter content increased significantly in all grafted plants.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- grafted plantse0
- Outcome
- dry matter content in the fruite0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In all grafted plants, the dry matter content in the fruit increased significantly”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend Karina and Stofuntovaya rootstocks for breeding research and grafted plant production.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Material
- Karinae0
- Outcome
- use in further research breeding work and the production of grafted plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rootstocks 2 (Karina) and 3 (Stofuntovaya) were noted, which are recommended for use in further research breeding work and the production of grafted plants”
t0“cucumber”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · quality: grain · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →grafting · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ
63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →grafting · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →grafting · quality: postharvest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →grafting · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.