Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pumpkin rootstock gave lower survival, growth, yield, nutrients and storage performance.

A claim from Evaluating Morphological Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Fruit Quality of Cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L.) Grafted on Cucurbitaceous Rootstocks · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin rootstock gave lower survival, growth, yield, nutrients and storage performance.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pumpkin rootstocke0
Outcome
growth, yield, nutrients, and storagee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
all other cucurbitaceous rootstockse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower survival rate of pumpkin rootstock made a significant poor performance with lower growth, yield, nutrients, and storage than all other cucurbitaceous rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1892
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81

Title

Evaluating Morphological Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Fruit Quality of Cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L.) Grafted on Cucurbitaceous Rootstocks

Waqas Aslam; Rana Shahzad Noor; Fiaz Hussain; et al. Agriculture 2020. doi:10.3390/agriculture10040101

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e7ae2bc0bfcc05d2020a6d33625259846fd16ffad60ab591cafc19c21da2796e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

grafting · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

72 papers: 64 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.