Paper · 2020 · Agriculture

Evaluating Morphological Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Fruit Quality of Cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L.) Grafted on Cucurbitaceous Rootstocks

Waqas Aslam; Rana Shahzad Noor; Fiaz Hussain; et al.

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
40
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Grafting is a substitute technique to boost tolerance against abiotic stresses, which also diminish root syndromes from soil-borne pathogens and increase crop production. This piloted study evaluates the tongue grafting technique and investigates the influence of grafting hybrid cucumber (Kalam F1) scion onto local cucurbitaceous and hybrid rootstocks on plant morphology, fruit yield, nutrients concentration in different plant organs, and postharvest fruit quality during three seasons of 2017 to 2019, consecutively. The research design was completely randomized (CRD), and the effects of grafted rootstocks were determined with comparison of percent plant survival, growth characteristics, fruit yield, and texture properties (during storage). The experimental results indicated that all rootstocks presented compatibility with hybrid cucumber (Kalam F1) scion and showed significant comparable performance with hybrid rootstock during all seasons in terms of vegetative growth, yield, and storage except pumpkin (68% during the 1st, 74% during the 2nd, and 71% during the 3rd seasons). The plants with Bottle gourd (Lagrenaria siceraria) rootstock showed the highest survival rate as compared to all other cucurbitaceous and hybrid rootstocks during three seasons: 94%, 98%, and 93%, respectively. Similarly, the other factors such as plant height (613, 622, and 615 cm), fruit weight (282, 281, and 277 g), fruit shape index (7.77, 8.18, and 8.25), Total soluble solids (TSS) (5.1%, 5.17%, and 4.96%), fruit dry matter (4.55%, 4.625, and 4.57%), fruit yield (4.37, 4.9, and 3.95 kg/plant), and disease resistance index (<3) during three seasons were comparable with all other cucurbitaceous and hybrid rootstocks. The lower survival rate of pumpkin rootstock made a significant poor performance with lower growth, yield, nutrients, and storage than all other cucurbitaceous rootstocks. Ridge and Bitter gourds showed improved results for vegetative growth, yield, fruit characteristics, nutritional values, and storage performance than that of hybrid cucumber rootstock. The fruit textural and physical properties were found significantly better at 10 °C than 25 °C for 10 days of storage without quality deterioration, while no impact was perceived on physical properties of the fruit. According to economic analysis, the grafted cucumber production system showed higher net return and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) in comparison with the real rooted hybrid cucumber production system, which was assumed to be profitable practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All rootstocks were compatible with Kalam F1 cucumber scions.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Material
Kalam F1e0
Outcome
compatibilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all rootstocks presented compatibility with hybrid cucumber (Kalam F1) scion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottle gourd rootstock gave the highest survival across three seasons.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Bottle gourd (Lagrenaria siceraria) rootstocke0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
94%, 98%, and 93%e0
Comparator
all other cucurbitaceous and hybrid rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants with Bottle gourd (Lagrenaria siceraria) rootstock showed the highest survival rate as compared to all other cucurbitaceous and hybrid rootstocks during three seasons: 94%, 98%, and 93%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottle gourd rootstock plants had heights of 613, 622 and 615 cm across seasons.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
613, 622, and 615 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (613, 622, and 615 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottle gourd rootstock fruit weights were 282, 281 and 277 g.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Value
282, 281, and 277 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight (282, 281, and 277 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottle gourd rootstock fruit shape indices were 7.77, 8.18 and 8.25.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
fruit shape indexe0
Value
7.77, 8.18, and 8.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit shape index (7.77, 8.18, and 8.25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottle gourd rootstock fruit TSS was 5.1%, 5.17% and 4.96%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
Total soluble solids (TSS)e0
Value
5.1%, 5.17%, and 4.96%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total soluble solids (TSS) (5.1%, 5.17%, and 4.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottle gourd rootstock fruit dry matter was 4.55%, 4.625 and 4.57%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
fruit dry mattere0
Value
4.55%, 4.625, and 4.57%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit dry matter (4.55%, 4.625, and 4.57%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1552 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottle gourd rootstock yields were 4.37, 4.9 and 3.95 kg per plant.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Value
4.37, 4.9, and 3.95 kg/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield (4.37, 4.9, and 3.95 kg/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The disease resistance index was below 3.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
disease resistance indexe0
Value
<3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease resistance index (<3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin rootstock survival was 68%, 74% and 71% across seasons.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pumpkine0
Outcome
pumpkine0
Value
68% during the 1st, 74% during the 2nd, and 71% during the 3rd seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pumpkin (68% during the 1st, 74% during the 2nd, and 71% during the 3rd seasons)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin rootstock gave lower survival, growth, yield, nutrients and storage performance.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pumpkin rootstocke0
Outcome
growth, yield, nutrients, and storagee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
all other cucurbitaceous rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower survival rate of pumpkin rootstock made a significant poor performance with lower growth, yield, nutrients, and storage than all other cucurbitaceous rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge gourd rootstock improved vegetative growth, yield and fruit traits over hybrid cucumber rootstock.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Ridgee0
Outcome
vegetative growth, yield, fruit characteristicse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
hybrid cucumber rootstocke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ridge and Bitter gourds showed improved results for vegetative growth, yield, fruit characteristics, nutritional values, and storage performance than that of hybrid cucumber rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1894–2077 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitter gourd rootstock improved vegetative growth, yield and fruit traits over hybrid cucumber rootstock.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Bitter gourdse0
Outcome
vegetative growth, yield, fruit characteristicse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
hybrid cucumber rootstocke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ridge and Bitter gourds showed improved results for vegetative growth, yield, fruit characteristics, nutritional values, and storage performance than that of hybrid cucumber rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1894–2077 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit texture was significantly better at 10 °C than 25 °C after ten days.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
10 °Ce0
Outcome
fruit textural and physical propertiese0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
10 days of storagee0
Comparator
25 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit textural and physical properties were found significantly better at 10 °C than 25 °C for 10 days of storage without quality deterioration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2083–2226 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted cucumber production had higher net return and benefit-cost ratio than own-rooted production.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
grafted cucumber production systeme0
Outcome
net return and benefit-cost ratio (BCR)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
real rooted hybrid cucumber production systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafted cucumber production system showed higher net return and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) in comparison with the real rooted hybrid cucumber production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2331–2488 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

72 papers: 64 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.