Abstract
Grafting is a substitute technique to boost tolerance against abiotic stresses, which also diminish root syndromes from soil-borne pathogens and increase crop production. This piloted study evaluates the tongue grafting technique and investigates the influence of grafting hybrid cucumber (Kalam F1) scion onto local cucurbitaceous and hybrid rootstocks on plant morphology, fruit yield, nutrients concentration in different plant organs, and postharvest fruit quality during three seasons of 2017 to 2019, consecutively. The research design was completely randomized (CRD), and the effects of grafted rootstocks were determined with comparison of percent plant survival, growth characteristics, fruit yield, and texture properties (during storage). The experimental results indicated that all rootstocks presented compatibility with hybrid cucumber (Kalam F1) scion and showed significant comparable performance with hybrid rootstock during all seasons in terms of vegetative growth, yield, and storage except pumpkin (68% during the 1st, 74% during the 2nd, and 71% during the 3rd seasons). The plants with Bottle gourd (Lagrenaria siceraria) rootstock showed the highest survival rate as compared to all other cucurbitaceous and hybrid rootstocks during three seasons: 94%, 98%, and 93%, respectively. Similarly, the other factors such as plant height (613, 622, and 615 cm), fruit weight (282, 281, and 277 g), fruit shape index (7.77, 8.18, and 8.25), Total soluble solids (TSS) (5.1%, 5.17%, and 4.96%), fruit dry matter (4.55%, 4.625, and 4.57%), fruit yield (4.37, 4.9, and 3.95 kg/plant), and disease resistance index (<3) during three seasons were comparable with all other cucurbitaceous and hybrid rootstocks. The lower survival rate of pumpkin rootstock made a significant poor performance with lower growth, yield, nutrients, and storage than all other cucurbitaceous rootstocks. Ridge and Bitter gourds showed improved results for vegetative growth, yield, fruit characteristics, nutritional values, and storage performance than that of hybrid cucumber rootstock. The fruit textural and physical properties were found significantly better at 10 °C than 25 °C for 10 days of storage without quality deterioration, while no impact was perceived on physical properties of the fruit. According to economic analysis, the grafted cucumber production system showed higher net return and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) in comparison with the real rooted hybrid cucumber production system, which was assumed to be profitable practice.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
All rootstocks were compatible with Kalam F1 cucumber scions.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse0
- Material
- Kalam F1e0
- Outcome
- compatibilitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all rootstocks presented compatibility with hybrid cucumber (Kalam F1) scion”
Claim · model-written summary
Bottle gourd rootstock gave the highest survival across three seasons.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Bottle gourd (Lagrenaria siceraria) rootstocke0
- Outcome
- survival ratee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 94%, 98%, and 93%e0
- Comparator
- all other cucurbitaceous and hybrid rootstockse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plants with Bottle gourd (Lagrenaria siceraria) rootstock showed the highest survival rate as compared to all other cucurbitaceous and hybrid rootstocks during three seasons: 94%, 98%, and 93%, respectively”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Bottle gourd rootstock plants had heights of 613, 622 and 615 cm across seasons.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Value
- 613, 622, and 615 cme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height (613, 622, and 615 cm)”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Bottle gourd rootstock fruit weights were 282, 281 and 277 g.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Outcome
- fruit weighte0
- Value
- 282, 281, and 277 ge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit weight (282, 281, and 277 g)”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Bottle gourd rootstock fruit shape indices were 7.77, 8.18 and 8.25.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Outcome
- fruit shape indexe0
- Value
- 7.77, 8.18, and 8.25e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit shape index (7.77, 8.18, and 8.25)”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Bottle gourd rootstock fruit TSS was 5.1%, 5.17% and 4.96%.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Outcome
- Total soluble solids (TSS)e0
- Value
- 5.1%, 5.17%, and 4.96%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total soluble solids (TSS) (5.1%, 5.17%, and 4.96%)”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Bottle gourd rootstock fruit dry matter was 4.55%, 4.625 and 4.57%.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Outcome
- fruit dry mattere0
- Value
- 4.55%, 4.625, and 4.57%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit dry matter (4.55%, 4.625, and 4.57%)”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Bottle gourd rootstock yields were 4.37, 4.9 and 3.95 kg per plant.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Value
- 4.37, 4.9, and 3.95 kg/plante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit yield (4.37, 4.9, and 3.95 kg/plant)”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
The disease resistance index was below 3.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Outcome
- disease resistance indexe0
- Value
- <3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“disease resistance index (<3)”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Pumpkin rootstock survival was 68%, 74% and 71% across seasons.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- pumpkine0
- Outcome
- pumpkine0
- Value
- 68% during the 1st, 74% during the 2nd, and 71% during the 3rd seasonse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pumpkin (68% during the 1st, 74% during the 2nd, and 71% during the 3rd seasons)”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Pumpkin rootstock gave lower survival, growth, yield, nutrients and storage performance.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- pumpkin rootstocke0
- Outcome
- growth, yield, nutrients, and storagee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- all other cucurbitaceous rootstockse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lower survival rate of pumpkin rootstock made a significant poor performance with lower growth, yield, nutrients, and storage than all other cucurbitaceous rootstocks”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Ridge gourd rootstock improved vegetative growth, yield and fruit traits over hybrid cucumber rootstock.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Ridgee0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth, yield, fruit characteristicse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- hybrid cucumber rootstocke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ridge and Bitter gourds showed improved results for vegetative growth, yield, fruit characteristics, nutritional values, and storage performance than that of hybrid cucumber rootstock”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Bitter gourd rootstock improved vegetative growth, yield and fruit traits over hybrid cucumber rootstock.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Bitter gourdse0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth, yield, fruit characteristicse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- hybrid cucumber rootstocke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ridge and Bitter gourds showed improved results for vegetative growth, yield, fruit characteristics, nutritional values, and storage performance than that of hybrid cucumber rootstock”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit texture was significantly better at 10 °C than 25 °C after ten days.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- 10 °Ce0
- Outcome
- fruit textural and physical propertiese0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Qualifier
- 10 days of storagee0
- Comparator
- 25 °Ce0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit textural and physical properties were found significantly better at 10 °C than 25 °C for 10 days of storage without quality deterioration”
t0“cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber production had higher net return and benefit-cost ratio than own-rooted production.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- grafted cucumber production systeme0
- Outcome
- net return and benefit-cost ratio (BCR)e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- real rooted hybrid cucumber production systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grafted cucumber production system showed higher net return and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) in comparison with the real rooted hybrid cucumber production system”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.