Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fruit tuber, melon edge and thorn color did not significantly differ between grafted and self-rooted seedlings.

A claim from Effects of different rootstock grafting on yield and quality of cucumber · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit tuber, melon edge and thorn color did not significantly differ between grafted and self-rooted seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
each rootstock grafting combinatione0
Outcome
fruit tuber, melon edge, thorn colore0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
self-rooted seedling (CK)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in fruit tuber, melon edge, thorn color and pulp crispness between self-rooted seedling (CK) and each rootstock grafting combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–812
t0

“Effects of different rootstock grafting on yield and quality of cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72

Title

Effects of different rootstock grafting on yield and quality of cucumber

Zhanming Tan; Zhengying Xuan; Juan Zhang; et al. Trends in Horticulture 2022. doi:10.24294/th.v5i2.1831

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-95af2cfa634ce7e612405b7e4906e2c8b4f398edd860d49325849ce114709bc8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

grafting · quality: postharvest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.