Claim · model-written summary
Yield efficiency and fruit per cluster varied among selections.
- Taxon
- Pawpaw
Asimina trilobat0 - Outcome
- Yield efficiency and average fruit per clustere0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield efficiency and average fruit per cluster also varied greatly among selections.”
t0“Pawpaw”
Title
Yield and Fruiting Characteristics of 28 Selections in the Kentucky Pawpaw Cultivar Trial
Kirk W. Pomper; Joseph G. Masabni; Desmond R. Layne; et al. HortScience 2004. doi:10.21273/hortsci.39.4.851a
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Observation In 2003, 54% of pawpaw trees survived.
- Observation Susquehanna had the poorest survival at 13%.
- Observation Most selections had excellent TCSA vigor, except 5-5 and Overleese.
- Observation 1-7-2 had fruit weight 194 g.
- Observation 1-68 had fruit weight 167g.
- Observation 4-2 had fruit weight 321 g.
- Observation 5-5 had fruit weight 225 g.
- Observation 7-90 had fruit weight 166g.
- Observation 9-58 had fruit weight 176 g.
- Observation 10-35 had fruit weight 167 g.
- Observation NC-1 had fruit weight 180 g.
- Observation `Sunflower' had fruit weight 204 g.
- Observation `Shenandoah' had fruit weight 168g.
- Observation `Middletown' had fruit weight 70 g.
- Observation `Wells' had fruit weight 78 g.
- Observation `Wilson' had fruit weight 88 g.
- Recommendation Several selections show promise for production in Kentucky.