Claim · model-written summary
1-68 had fruit weight 167g.
- Taxon
- Pawpaw
Asimina trilobat0 - Material
- 1-68e0
- Outcome
- Average fruit weighte1
- Direction
- greateste1
- Value
- 167ge0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1-68 (167g)”
e1“Average fruit weight was greatest”
t0“Pawpaw”
Title
Yield and Fruiting Characteristics of 28 Selections in the Kentucky Pawpaw Cultivar Trial
Kirk W. Pomper; Joseph G. Masabni; Desmond R. Layne; et al. HortScience 2004. doi:10.21273/hortsci.39.4.851a
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Observation In 2003, 54% of pawpaw trees survived.
- Observation Susquehanna had the poorest survival at 13%.
- Observation Most selections had excellent TCSA vigor, except 5-5 and Overleese.
- Observation 1-7-2 had fruit weight 194 g.
- Observation 4-2 had fruit weight 321 g.
- Observation 5-5 had fruit weight 225 g.
- Observation 7-90 had fruit weight 166g.
- Observation 9-58 had fruit weight 176 g.
- Observation 10-35 had fruit weight 167 g.
- Observation NC-1 had fruit weight 180 g.
- Observation `Sunflower' had fruit weight 204 g.
- Observation `Shenandoah' had fruit weight 168g.
- Observation `Middletown' had fruit weight 70 g.
- Observation `Wells' had fruit weight 78 g.
- Observation `Wilson' had fruit weight 88 g.
- Observation Yield efficiency and fruit per cluster varied among selections.
- Recommendation Several selections show promise for production in Kentucky.