Claim · model-written summary
BR and GR did not differ.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Outcome
- no differencese0
- Comparator
- BR and GR treatmentse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there were no differences between BR and GR treatments.”
t0“soybean”
Title
Srinivasa R. Pinnamaneni; Partson Mubvumba; Saseendran S. Anapalli; et al. Frontiers in Soil Science 2022. doi:10.3389/fsoil.2022.970380
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Cover crops improved soil organic carbon by 7 to 12.5%.
- Intervention effect Cover crops improved soil organic matter by 9 to 15%.
- Intervention effect Cover crops improved soil total nitrogen by 13 to 29%.
- Intervention effect Cover crops improved water-stable aggregates by 26 to 68%.
- Intervention effect Cover crops improved saturated conductivity by 5 to 9%.
- Intervention effect Cover crops reduced bulk density by 8%.
- Intervention effect Cover crops reduced penetration resistance by 14 to 18%.
- Intervention effect Soybean root characteristics were similar across treatments.
- Recommendation Rye cover crop may improve soil properties without changing roots.