Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Potassium plus micronutrient fertilization did not suppress pitch canker occurrence or severity.

A claim from Pitch Canker in Young Loblolly Pines: Influence of Precommercial Thinning and Fertilization on Disease Incidence and Severity · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium plus micronutrient fertilization did not suppress pitch canker occurrence or severity.

Taxon
Loblolly PinesPinus taedat0
Treatment
Fertilization with potassium plus micronutrientse0
Outcome
disease occurrence or severitye0
Direction
did not suppresse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with potassium plus micronutrients did not suppress disease occurrence or severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–934
t0

“Loblolly Pines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–36

Title

Pitch Canker in Young Loblolly Pines: Influence of Precommercial Thinning and Fertilization on Disease Incidence and Severity

G.M. Blakeslee; E.J. Jokela; C.H. Hollis; et al. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 1999. doi:10.1093/sjaf/23.3.139

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-760addfa7febf27d5b225259a9b93ecd3aa1ca8d79da61905c1de12a12327fec · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · disease · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.