Claim · model-written summary
Benefit Cost Ratio favored intercropping over sole cropping.
- Taxon
- Cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- Benefit Cost Ratioe0
- Direction
- advantagee0
- Comparator
- sole croppinge0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Benefit Cost Ratio also showed that there is advantage of intercropping than sole cropping.”
t0“Some Cowpea Genotype”
Title
Evaluation of the Suitability of Some Cowpea Genotype for Maize-Cowpea Intercrop in Northern Ghana
Abeku Tetteh; Francis Kusi; Raphael Adu-Gyamfi; et al. American Journal of Plant Sciences 2021. doi:10.4236/ajps.2021.1212127
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Association Genotype and intercrop pattern interaction did not affect seeds per pod.
- Association The interaction influenced yield, pods per plant, height, flowering and seed weight.
- Observation Four MAGIC genotypes had higher yield under strip and sole cropping.
- Observation SARC1-57-2 had highest yield in row intercropping.
- Observation Five genotypes led fodder production.
- Observation All genotypes had land equivalent ratio above one.
- Observation MAGIC 048 had the highest LER in strip intercrop.