Claim · model-written summary
Bradyrhizobium inoculation increased final pod number of soybean by 29% relative to the non-inoculated control.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- Inoculatione3
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobiumt0symbiont - Outcome
- final pod numbere3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 29%e3
- Comparator
- non-inoculated controle1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“A Short Season Canadian Soybean Cultivar Double Cropped After Winter Wheat in Uzbekistan With and Without Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium”
e0“An experiment was conducted in the Fergana valley, in Uzbekistan, Central Asia, to determine the feasibility of growing a short-season Canadian soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) cultivar after the harvest of winter wheat in early July”
e1“An inoculated treatment was compared to a non-inoculated control in a randomized complete block design with four blocks”
e3“Inoculation in 2004 increased seed weights by 30%, final pod number by 29%, biomass dry weight at the pod-filling stage (56%) and at harvest (56%), as well as the harvest index by 22%”
Title
M. Bourgault; C. A. Madramootoo; H. A. Webber; et al. Journal of Plant Studies 2015. doi:10.5539/jps.v4n2p74
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Bradyrhizobium inoculation doubled soybean yield relative to the non-inoculated control (106% increase) in 2004.
- Intervention effect Bradyrhizobium inoculation increased soybean seed weight by 30% relative to the non-inoculated control.
- Intervention effect Bradyrhizobium inoculation increased soybean biomass dry weight at the pod-filling stage by 56% relative to the non-inoculated control.
- Intervention effect Bradyrhizobium inoculation increased soybean biomass dry weight at harvest by 56% relative to the non-inoculated control.
- Intervention effect Bradyrhizobium inoculation increased soybean harvest index by 22% relative to the non-inoculated control.
- Observation Soybean nodules were present only in the inoculated treatments.
- Observation Appropriate indigenous rhizobial strains were not present in the experimental soils.
- Observation Ineffective rhizobial competitors to commercial inoculants were absent from the experimental soils.
- Recommendation Soybean production could be possible in Uzbekistan without competing with cotton and winter wheat.
- Observation Soybean production after winter wheat represents an additional income of more than 300 $ per hectare based on 2004 prices.