Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Averaged over 1981-1990, no statistically significant yield differences were detected among tillage treatments in continuous corn.

A claim from LONG-TERM TILLAGE EFFECTS ON CONTINUOUS CORN YIELDS · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Averaged over 1981-1990, no statistically significant yield differences were detected among tillage treatments in continuous corn.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse3
Treatment
alternative tillage systemse3
Outcome
yield differencese1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
moldboard plow (MP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of no-tillage (NT), chisel plow (CP), and moldboard plow (MP) treatments on plant density and grain yield was measured from 1981 through 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–485
e1

“No statistically significant yield differences among tillage treatments, when averaged over the 10-year period covered by the experiment, were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1166
e3

“Long-term comparisons of alternative tillage systems are needed to evaluate their effect on corn (Zea mays L.) yield under the variable temperature and rainfall conditions of the Corn Belt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–188

Title

LONG-TERM TILLAGE EFFECTS ON CONTINUOUS CORN YIELDS

T. B. Bailey; J. B. Swan; R L. Higgs; et al. Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture 1996. doi:10.4148/2475-7772.1315

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-79f3d484c73b62b2e6c2ddde144d06814e5a2c94f32ddf82725525335ee007bd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this claim · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.