Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Integrated treatments significantly reduced emerged Striga number in 2002.

A claim from Integrated control of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. in Burkina Faso through host plant resistance, biocontrol and fertilizers · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated treatments significantly reduced emerged Striga number in 2002.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
sorghum resistance with Fusarium inoculum and N-fertilizer or manuree0
Interactor
StrigaStrigae0weed
Second interactor
FusariumFusariume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
emerged Striga plant numbere0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Striga
Striga · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marco Schmidt [1] · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments combining sorghum resistance with Fusarium inoculum and N-fertilizer or manure significantly reduced emerged Striga plant number, plant vigour and dry biomass of Striga and the area under the Striga number progress curve (ASNPC) in 2002, as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–602

Title

Integrated control of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. in Burkina Faso through host plant resistance, biocontrol and fertilizers

D Yonli; H Traore; TA Van Mourik; et al. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 2012. doi:10.4314/ijbcs.v5i5.8

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-7ab0c1dd1aea7aaab49b21b0ceb84ab1017022efa424030cfad6b19903e076c5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Fusarium · Striga · SorghumResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

inoculation · Striga · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · Striga · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.