Claim · model-written summary
The irrigation regimes did not differ in the temporal water use efficiency analysis for sugar beet.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- irrigation regimese0
- Outcome
- WUE dm and WUE hdme0
- Direction
- not betweene0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The temporal analysis of water use efficiency showed WUE dm and WUE hdm greater in the middle of crop cycle in autumnal than in spring sugar beet, but not between the irrigation regimes.”
Title
Efficiency of Water Use in Sugar Beet and Processing Tomato Cropped in Southern Italy
Michele Rinaldi; Elvio Di Paolo; Alessandro Vittorio Vonella Italian Journal of Agronomy 2006. doi:10.4081/ija.2006.369
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Autumn sowing gave higher sugar beet harvestable yield water use efficiency than spring sowing, 2.44 versus 1.08 kg m -3.
- Intervention effect Autumn sowing gave higher sugar beet sucrose water use efficiency than spring sowing, 2.12 versus 0.84 kg m -3.
- Intervention effect Sugar beet irrigation regimes did not differ significantly in water use efficiency.
- Intervention effect Reduced irrigation gave higher sugar beet dry matter water use efficiency than optimal irrigation only with spring sowing.
- Intervention effect Tomato dry matter water use efficiency was unaffected by irrigation regime.
- Intervention effect Tomato ET 66 had higher harvestable yield water use efficiency than ET 100, 1.19 versus 1.00 kg m -3.
- Association Year significantly affected dry matter water use efficiency, with the lowest values in the driest year.
- Association Year significantly affected harvestable yield water use efficiency, with the lowest values in the driest year.
- Observation Irrigation water use efficiency was higher in tomato than sugar beet for dry matter, harvestable product, and economic return.
- Intervention effect Midcycle dry matter water use efficiency was higher for autumn than spring sugar beet.
- Intervention effect Midcycle harvestable yield water use efficiency was higher for autumn than spring sugar beet.
- Intervention effect Tomato ET 66 used water most efficiently, particularly at the crop cycle end.