Claim · model-written summary
Control had benefit-cost ratio 1:0:67.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“benefit-cost ratios”
e1“control (1:0:67)”
Title
Suman Mohanty; Anoorag R. Tayde International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2231429
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Insecticide and biopesticide treatments reduced pest infestation relative to control.
- Intervention effect Spinosad 45%SC gave the lowest pod borer infestation and was significantly superior to untreated control.
- Intervention effect Emamectin benzoate followed Spinosad in infestation suppression and was significantly superior to untreated control.
- Intervention effect Indoxacarb followed Emamectin in infestation suppression and was significantly superior to untreated control.
- Intervention effect Spinosad produced maximum grain yield of 22.50 q/ha compared with control at 6.66 q/ha.
- Observation Spinosad was the best and most economical treatment, with benefit-cost ratio 1:3.75.
- Observation Emamectin benzoate had benefit-cost ratio 1:3.71.
- Observation Indoxacarb had benefit-cost ratio 1:2.94.
- Observation Profenophos had benefit-cost ratio 1:2.53.
- Observation NSKE had benefit-cost ratio 1:2.19.
- Observation Karanja oil had benefit-cost ratio 1:1.53.
- Observation Bacillus thuringiensis treatment had benefit-cost ratio 1:0.87.