Claim · model-written summary
The M9 power model using DBH and height best predicted culm and total aboveground biomass in both species.
- Taxon
- Bambusa teres and Bambusa tulda
Bambusa tulda
Bambusa terest0 - Outcome
- predicting culm biomass and total aboveground biomasse0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- adj. R 2 > 0.80e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Bambusa teres and Bambusa tulda”
e0“The power model incorporating both DBH and height (M9) performed best (adj. R 2 > 0.80) for predicting culm biomass and total aboveground biomass in both species”
Title
Aastha Sharma; Santosh Ayer; Keshav Ayer; et al. Agroforestry Systems 2025. doi:10.1007/s10457-025-01221-9
Other claims from this paper (3)
- Observation B. tulda had significantly higher mean DBH, foliage biomass, and branch biomass than B. teres.
- Method / resource None of the models accurately predicted foliage or branch biomass.
- Recommendation The authors recommend species- and age-specific and belowground biomass models for other bamboo species.