Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend species- and age-specific and belowground biomass models for other bamboo species.
- Outcome
- development of species- and age-specific allometric models for other bamboo species along with belowground biomass modelse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
t0“Bambusa teres and Bambusa tulda”
e0“We recommend development of species- and age-specific allometric models for other bamboo species along with belowground biomass models”
Title
Aastha Sharma; Santosh Ayer; Keshav Ayer; et al. Agroforestry Systems 2025. doi:10.1007/s10457-025-01221-9
Other claims from this paper (3)
- Observation B. tulda had significantly higher mean DBH, foliage biomass, and branch biomass than B. teres.
- Method / resource The M9 power model using DBH and height best predicted culm and total aboveground biomass in both species.
- Method / resource None of the models accurately predicted foliage or branch biomass.