Claim · model-written summary
Mistletoes had higher Huber values, sapwood density and vessel density than hosts.
- Taxon
- mistletoese0
- Interactor
- hostse0host
- Outcome
- Huber values, sapwood density and vessel densitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- their hostse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“mistletoes were more drought tolerant compared with their hosts, characterized by more negative midday leaf water potentials during the dry season, turgor loss point (ranging from -1.81 to -2.48 MPa) and water potential at 12% loss of conductivity (ranging from -0.97 to -2.94 MPa), higher Huber values, sapwood density and vessel density”
Title
Survival secrets of mistletoes: high drought tolerance in canopy habitats
Xian-Yan Huang; Yun-Bing Zhang; Marina Corrêa Scalon; et al. Tree Physiology 2025. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpaf071
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Observation Mistletoes were more drought tolerant than hosts.
- Observation Mistletoes had more negative midday leaf water potentials during the dry season than hosts.
- Observation Mistletoe turgor loss point ranged from -1.81 to -2.48 MPa and was more negative than in hosts.
- Observation Mistletoe water potential at 12% conductivity loss ranged from -0.97 to -2.94 MPa.
- Observation Mistletoes had lower leaf size, specific leaf area and vein density than hosts.
- Observation Mistletoes had lower stomatal density than hosts.
- Observation Mistletoes had lower leaf-specific and sapwood-specific hydraulic conductivity and vessel diameter than hosts.
- Observation Mistletoes had lower water-use efficiency, indicated by more negative stable carbon isotope values.
- Association Mistletoes had stronger trait correlations within leaves and between leaf and stem than hosts.
- Association No hydraulic efficiency-safety trade-off was observed across mistletoes and hosts.
- Observation Mistletoe hydraulic traits showed high plasticity across hosts.
- Observation Water potentials at 12%, 50% and 88% conductivity loss varied significantly within mistletoe species across hosts.
- Observation Both intraspecific and interspecific variation drove mistletoe trait correlations.
- Observation Interspecific variation contributed more than intraspecific variation to mistletoe trait correlations.