Claim · model-written summary
Group II followed Group I in grain growth characteristics.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Material
- Group IIe0
- Outcome
- followed by Group IIe0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Rice”
e0“Group I (superior primary-branches) was considered to be the fastest for grain filling and greatest for dry matter weight, followed by Group II (medium primary-branches).”
Title
Quan Zhao; Xiangyang Hao; Izhar Ali; et al. Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10020223
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation All primary branches had similar slow–fast–slow dry-matter accumulation.
- Observation Top branches of Nongle 1 had 86% higher maximum grain growth rates than basal branches.
- Observation Top branches of Guifeng 2 had 44% higher maximum grain growth rates than basal branches.
- Observation Top branches of Nongle 1 had 32% greater maximum final grain weights than basal branches.
- Observation Top branches of Guifeng 2 had 18% greater maximum final grain weights than basal branches.
- Observation Basal branches of Nongle 1 had 1.5 times longer active grain filling than top branches.
- Observation Basal branches of Guifeng 2 had 1.3 times longer active grain filling than top branches.
- Observation Basal branches of Nongle 1 took 2.2 times longer to reach maximum grain growth rate than top branches.
- Observation Basal branches of Guifeng 2 took 2.5 times longer to reach maximum grain growth rate than top branches.
- Observation Group I had the fastest grain filling.
- Observation Group I had the greatest dry matter weight.
- Observation Group III had the poorest growth.
- Recommendation The authors propose improving Group III growth to raise yield of poorly filling basal grains.