Claim · model-written summary
2,4-D amine followed by paraquat was ineffective for cotton stalk regrowth control.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- paraquate0
- Outcome
- glyphosate-resistant transgenic cotton stalk regrowthe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cotton”
e0“a 2,4-D amine spraying followed by the application of carfentrazone-ethyl, paraquat, saflufenacil, paraquat + diuron or glufosinate-ammonium are not effective to control glyphosate-resistant transgenic cotton stalk regrowth”
Title
Chemical control of stalk regrowth in glyphosate-resistant transgenic cotton
Alexandre C. de B. Ferreira; Julio C. Bogiani; Valdinei Sofiatti; et al. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 2018. doi:10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n8p530-534
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Cotton stalk regrowth varied among three environments.
- Intervention effect Two sequential 2,4-D amine applications produced better stalk destruction, with 4.9% regrowth at SHGO in 2013.
- Observation Two sequential 2,4-D amine applications left 16.9% cotton stalk regrowth at SHGO in 2014.
- Observation Two sequential 2,4-D amine applications left 36.9% cotton stalk regrowth at LEM-BA in 2014.
- Intervention effect A single 2,4-D amine application was ineffective for cotton stalk regrowth control.
- Intervention effect 2,4-D amine followed by carfentrazone-ethyl was ineffective for cotton stalk regrowth control.
- Intervention effect 2,4-D amine followed by saflufenacil was ineffective for cotton stalk regrowth control.
- Intervention effect 2,4-D amine followed by paraquat plus diuron was ineffective for cotton stalk regrowth control.
- Intervention effect 2,4-D amine followed by glufosinate-ammonium was ineffective for cotton stalk regrowth control.