Observationmodel-written summary

Two sequential 2,4-D amine applications left 16.9% cotton stalk regrowth at SHGO in 2014.

A claim from Chemical control of stalk regrowth in glyphosate-resistant transgenic cotton · 2018

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sequential 2,4-D amine applications left 16.9% cotton stalk regrowth at SHGO in 2014.

Treatment
Two sequential 2,4-D amine applications, each with 1,000 g ha-1 of acid equivalente0
Outcome
cotton stalk regrowthe0
Value
16.9e0
Setting
SHGOe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76
e0

“Two sequential 2,4-D amine applications, each with 1,000 g ha-1 of acid equivalent, resulted in better cotton stalk destruction, albeit with 4.9, 16.9 and 36.9% of cotton stalk regrowth in SHGO 2013 and 2014, and LEM-BA 2014, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1152

Title

Chemical control of stalk regrowth in glyphosate-resistant transgenic cotton

Alexandre C. de B. Ferreira; Julio C. Bogiani; Valdinei Sofiatti; et al. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 2018. doi:10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n8p530-534

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-8a957bb2a37169c0de9fd1bb5622094b19b71be6fe891d934387932d4b1c5210 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer