Claim · model-written summary
Tomato dry mass remained constant across soil types with iodine treatment.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- Iodinet0
- Outcome
- dry mass valuese0
- Direction
- remained constante0
- Qualifier
- independent of the soil-typee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for tomato plant parts, independent of the soil-type, the dry mass values remained constant.”
t0“Iodine on Plant Physiological Processes”
Title
Péter Dobosy; Viktória Vetési; Sirat Sandil; et al. Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10050720
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Iodine treatment did not significantly alter cabbage or tomato leaf photosynthetic efficiency or chlorophyll.
- Intervention effect Iodine slightly stimulated cabbage leaf growth on sand and sandy silt.
- Intervention effect Cabbage leaf growth on silt was unchanged under iodine treatment.
- Observation At 0.5 mg/L iodine irrigation, cabbage leaves on sandy soil reached 10 mg/kg dry matter iodine.
- Observation At 0.5 mg/L iodine irrigation, tomato fruits on sandy soil reached 3.6 mg/kg dry matter iodine.
- Observation A 100 g portion of cabbage leaves would cover about 80% of recommended iodine intake.
- Observation A 100 g portion of tomato fruits would cover about 15% of recommended iodine intake.
- Intervention effect Iodine reduced Fe and P concentrations in tomato fruit across soil types.
- Intervention effect Iodine left Mg, Cu, Mn, Zn and B concentration in tomato fruit practically unchanged.
- Intervention effect Cabbage did not show the same iodine-associated Fe and P reduction.