Claim · model-written summary
The UPLC-MS method showed repeatability with RSD below 2.3%.
CrataegusNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality evaluation of hawthorn leaves”
e1“validated in terms of linearity (R2 > 0.9971), intraday and interday precision (RSD < 2.0%), repeatability (RSD < 2.3%), stability (RSD < 2.5%) and recovery (96.2–103.8%)”
Title
Baoxin Xu; Mingyu Yang; Yilong Du; et al. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 2018. doi:10.1016/j.bjp.2018.03.005
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Method / resource The UPLC-MS method showed linearity with R2 above 0.9971.
- Method / resource The UPLC-MS method showed intraday and interday precision with RSD below 2.0%.
- Method / resource The UPLC-MS method showed stability with RSD below 2.5%.
- Method / resource The UPLC-MS method showed recovery of 96.2–103.8%.
- Method / resource Eight components were determined simultaneously by the method.
- Observation Hawthorn leaves and Guang hawthorn leaves differ in components and content.
- Recommendation Hawthorn leaves and Guang hawthorn leaves cannot substitute each other in clinical medication.
- Method / resource The method was successfully applied to quality evaluation of hawthorn leaves against Guang hawthorn leaves.