View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC method showed good repeatability .
Outcomegood repeatability e0 Valuegood repeatability e0 Not reported Material Organ / stage Interactor Treatment Comparator Setting Direction Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “this method has a good repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–515 t0 “Rumex gmelini ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–33 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The tool increased repeatability .
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the repeatability in results were increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1522 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree height repeatability exceeded diameter repeatability at all sites.
Verbatim
e0 “the repeatability and heritability of tree height were greater than those of DBH at all sites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–616 e1 “Populus deltoides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–56 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The two repeatability methods agreed in magnitude, though repeatability differed among 14 traits.
Outcomerepeatability coefficients e0 Comparatorthe two methods e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was agreement on the magnitude of repeatability coefficients obtained by the two methods; however, they varied among the 14 characteristics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1025 e1 “ANOVA and CPCOR ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–651 t0 “peach fruits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The fingerprint method showed good repeatability .
Verbatim
e0 “this method had a good repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–386 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
TSS, TTA and bunch length had low repeatability .
Outcomerepeatability coefficients e0 Verbatim
e0 “The traits TSS, TTA and bunch length presented 10w repeatability coefficients ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1105 t0 “grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Simplified AmpSeq showed high repeatability .
Valuehigh repeatability e0 Not reported Taxon Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Interactor role Second interactor Second interactor role Treatment Comparator Setting Direction Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “Simplified AmpSeq has the advantages of high repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1118 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Assay repeatability was 8.5%.
Verbatim
e0 “repeatability 8.5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–324 t0 “Ornithogalum caudatum Ait ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability coefficients of Theobroma grandiflorum fruit characters ranged from low to moderate.
Outcomerepeatability coefficients e1 Verbatim
t0 “Repeatability of morpho-agronomic characters of Theobroma grandiflorum fruits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 e1 “The repeatability coefficients ranged from low to moderate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1033 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean grain yield repeatability was 0.73, higher than ecovalence repeatability .
Outcomerepeatability of mean grain yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “The repeatability of mean grain yield (rk 2=0.73) was higher than Wi 2 (rk 2=0.18) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–817 t0 “common bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.