Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The HPLC method showed good repeatability.

Taxon
Rumex gmelinit0
Outcome
good repeatabilitye0
Value
good repeatabilitye0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“this method has a good repeatability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–515
t0

“Rumex gmelini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–33

Title

HPLC fingerprint of Rumex gmelini from different habitats

Cui Honghua 2005

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tool increased repeatability.

Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the repeatability in results were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1522

Title

Leaf detector box: Artificial vision system for leaf area identification

Manuel Agudelo Restrepo Cristian; Eduardo Roa-Guerrero Edgar; Numpaque López Humberto African Journal of Agricultural Research 2017. doi:10.5897/ajar2016.11698

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree height repeatability exceeded diameter repeatability at all sites.

Taxon
Populus deltoidesPopulus deltoidese1
Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
DBHe0

Verbatim

e0

“the repeatability and heritability of tree height were greater than those of DBH at all sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–616
e1

“Populus deltoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–56

Title

G×E Analysis of Early Growth Traits of Populus deltoides in East China by Using BLUP-GGE

Zhengsai Yuan; Yufeng Dong; Ning Liu; et al. Forests 2022. doi:10.3390/f13111808

Other claims from this paper (12)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two repeatability methods agreed in magnitude, though repeatability differed among 14 traits.

Outcome
repeatability coefficientse0
Comparator
the two methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“There was agreement on the magnitude of repeatability coefficients obtained by the two methods; however, they varied among the 14 characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1025
e1

“ANOVA and CPCOR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–651
t0

“peach fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101

Title

Repeatability, correlation and path analysis of physical and chemical characteristics of peach fruits

Rosana Gonçalves Pires Matias; Claudio Horst Bruckner; Pedro Crescêncio Souza Carneiro; et al. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 2014. doi:10.1590/0100-2945-272/13

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fingerprint method showed good repeatability.

Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Direction
goode0
Comparator
this methode0

Verbatim

e0

“this method had a good repeatability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–386

Title

Fingerprint of Flos Lonicerae by HPLC-FPC

Qian Wang Zhongchengyao 2005

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS, TTA and bunch length had low repeatability.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
repeatability coefficientse0
Direction
10we0

Verbatim

e0

“The traits TSS, TTA and bunch length presented 10w repeatability coefficients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1105
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58

Title

Estimates of repeatability and path coefficients on grapes

Patrícia Coelho de Souza Leão; João Gomes da Costa DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2003

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simplified AmpSeq showed high repeatability.

Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Value
high repeatabilitye0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Simplified AmpSeq has the advantages of high repeatability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1118

Title

Rapid and easy construction of a simplified amplicon sequencing (simplified AmpSeq) library for marker-assisted selection

Sogo Nishio; Shigeki Moriya; Miyuki Kunihisa; et al. Scientific Reports 2023. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37522-1

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assay repeatability was 8.5%.

Taxon
Ornithogalum caudatum AitAlbuca bracteatat0
Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Value
8.5%e0

Verbatim

e0

“repeatability 8.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–324
t0

“Ornithogalum caudatum Ait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55

Title

Polysaccharide Assay Study of Ornithogalum caudatum Ait

WU Li-jun Modern Chinese Medicine 2011

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability coefficients of Theobroma grandiflorum fruit characters ranged from low to moderate.

Taxon
Theobroma grandiflorumTheobroma grandiflorumt0
Outcome
repeatability coefficientse1
Value
low to moderatee1

Verbatim

t0

“Repeatability of morpho-agronomic characters of Theobroma grandiflorum fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77
e1

“The repeatability coefficients ranged from low to moderate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1033

Title

Repeatability of morpho-agronomic characters of Theobroma grandiflorum fruits

Ayulle Thalía Watson Alcoforado; Cássia Ângela Pedrozo; Marcos Miguel Mayer; et al. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 2019. doi:10.1590/0100-29452019142

Other claims from this paper (2)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean grain yield repeatability was 0.73, higher than ecovalence repeatability.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
repeatability of mean grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
rk 2=0.73e0
Comparator
Wi 2e0

Verbatim

e0

“The repeatability of mean grain yield (rk 2=0.73) was higher than Wi 2 (rk 2=0.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–817
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26

Title

Homeostasis of common bean populations with different genetic structures

Bruzi, Adriano Teodoro; Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto; Abreu, Ângela de Fátima Barbosa; et al. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) 2011

Other claims from this paper (5)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.