Claim · model-written summary
Cluster II had five accessions from naturally occurring citrus hybrids.
CitrusNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cluster II, III, IV, V and VI have 5, 2, 2, 4 and 13 accession members, respectively. Members of Cluster I are the majority in the mandarin type with spheroids fruit shape with truncate on the fruit top. Cluster II contains citrus accessions from naturally occurring hybrids”
Title
Genetic Diversity Assessment of Citrus Accessions Grown in Indonesia Using Molecular Markers
Chaireni Martasari; Farida Yulianti; Sri Widyaningsih; et al. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science 2023. doi:10.17503/agrivita.v41i0.4165
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Observation The citrus accessions formed six major ISSR and SSR clusters.
- Observation Cluster I had 25 members, predominantly mandarin types with spheroid fruit and a truncate top.
- Observation Cluster III had two orange accessions grown in different climates.
- Observation Clusters IV and V had two and four accessions and shared ancestry with Citrus aurantifolia and Citrus limonia.
- Observation Cluster VI was a pumelo group containing Citrus maxima.
- Recommendation The ISSR and SSR clustering was considered useful for citrus breeding.
- Association The authors state that parental genetic distance affects progeny heterosis.