Claim · model-written summary
S. minor did not damage turfgrass.
- Taxon
- turfgrasse0
- Treatment
- S. minore0
- Interactor
- S. minorSclerotinia minore0biocontrol_agente1
- Outcome
- damage the turfgrasse0
- Direction
- did not damagee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“S. minor did not damage the turfgrass”
e1“a biocontrol agent, Sclerotinia minor”
Title
Impact of mowing and weed control on broadleaf weed population dynamics in turf
Mohammed Abu-Dieyeh; Alan Watson Journal of Plant Interactions 2005. doi:10.1080/17429140601015226
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Mowing did not reduce dandelion population density.
- Intervention effect Mowing did not reduce broadleaf weed ground cover.
- Intervention effect In year two, mowing significantly reduced white clover density.
- Intervention effect In year two, mowing significantly increased broadleaf plantain density, especially at 3–5 cm.
- Intervention effect S. minor and Killex equally suppressed four broadleaf weed species in year two except at close mowing height.
- Intervention effect Common mallow increased in herbicide treated plots.
- Intervention effect Yellow woodsorrel, yellow toadflax and lambsquarters increased in close-mown and Killex plots.
- Intervention effect Killex and S. minor rarely differed significantly in dandelion population dynamics.
- Intervention effect Killex reduced turf quality in 25% of plots.
- Intervention effect S. minor with regular medium-height mowing effectively controlled broadleaf weeds in Kentucky bluegrass turf.