Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Primary-branch spikelet numbers did not change appreciably.

A claim from Response of differentiated and degenerated spikelets to top-dressing, shading and day/night temperature treatments in rice cultivars with large panicles · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary-branch spikelet numbers did not change appreciably.

Outcome
number of spikelets on the primary branchese0
Direction
did not change appreciablye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of spikelets on the primary branches did not change appreciably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1206
t0

“rice cultivars with large panicles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–152

Title

Response of differentiated and degenerated spikelets to top-dressing, shading and day/night temperature treatments in rice cultivars with large panicles

Youli Yao; Yoshinori Yamamoto; Tetsushi Yoshida; et al. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 2000. doi:10.1080/00380768.2000.10409128

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-83e2cc15e87f790aab923cd6db56892af531884bd39b01226c991e12ff17e2b9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer