Claim · model-written summary
Plant stand was highest in CT plots.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“The performance of two sweet corn (Zea mays var. saccharata) cultivars grown in the Rio Grande Valley in Spring 1997”
e1“Plant stand was highest in CT plots”
Title
Sweet Corn Performance under Different Tillage Systems
D.J. Makus HortScience 1998. doi:10.21273/hortsci.33.4.594d
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Observation Sweet corn cultivars differed in leaf greenness and plant stand.
- Observation Sweet corn cultivars differed in ear diameter, ear length and ear dry matter.
- Observation Sweet corn cultivars differed in percentage of total yield at first harvest, season yield and ears per hectare.
- Observation One sweet corn cultivar had higher ear concentrations of total N, K and S.
- Observation One sweet corn cultivar had higher ear concentrations of NO3 and B.
- Observation One sweet corn cultivar had lower ear Mg concentration.
- Observation One sweet corn cultivar had lower ear Ca, Fe and Mn concentrations.
- Association Amaranthus weed populations were higher under one sweet corn cultivar than the other.
- Intervention effect MT and CT tillage gave greater ear attributes, yield and ears per hectare than NT.
- Intervention effect MT and CT tillage gave less corn earworm damage than NT.
- Intervention effect MT and CT tillage gave lower ear S concentrations than NT.
- Intervention effect MT and CT tillage gave fewer total weeds per hectare than NT.
- Intervention effect Panicum and Amaranthus weed populations were higher in NT-grown corn than in MT- or CT-grown corn.
- Observation Texas tridens and common purslane weed populations were not higher in NT-grown corn than in MT- or CT-grown corn.