Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar Mn application at FEEKES 10 was not as satisfactory for correcting Mn deficiency in oats as at FEEKES 6.

A claim from EVALUATION OF PLANT TISSUE CRITERIA FOR PREDICTING MANGANESE DEFICIENCY IN OATS · 1984

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Mn application at FEEKES 10 was not as satisfactory for correcting Mn deficiency in oats as at FEEKES 6.

Treatment
foliar application of Mn at FEEKES 10e3
Outcome
correction of Mn deficiencye3
Direction
not as satisfactorye3
Comparator
FEEKES 6e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Mn status of oat (Avena sativa L. ’Harmon’) plants grown on an organic soil in a field study was assessed using three plant criteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136
e3

“correction of Mn deficiency by foliar application of Mn at FEEKES 10 was not as satisfactory as at FEEKES 6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–743

Title

EVALUATION OF PLANT TISSUE CRITERIA FOR PREDICTING MANGANESE DEFICIENCY IN OATS

R. E. KARAMANOS; G. A. KRUGER; J. L. HENRY Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1984. doi:10.4141/cjps84-118

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-87299cdb111caa0d1d504b884eaaf76b7ba39611c65d01d6eb6d146cb5c2c765 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

manganese atom · nutrient: content · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.