Claim · model-written summary
Favoring pea inoculum did not reduce fababean yield.
- Taxon
- fababeans
Vicia fabat0 - Treatment
- pea inoculume0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- not sufficient to reducee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Favoring the pea inoculum led to a significant decrease in acetylene reduction, but this was not sufficient to reduce yield.”
t0“FABABEANS”
Title
INOCULUM SPECIFICITY IN FABABEANS AND PEAS
J. R. DEAN; K. W. CLARK Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1979. doi:10.4141/cjps79-005
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Intervention effect Pea inoculum or indigenous inoculum performed significantly worse than fababean specific rhizobia in fababeans.
- Intervention effect Favored specific fababean inoculum was equally effective with or without nonspecific inoculum competition.
- Intervention effect Favoring pea inoculum significantly decreased acetylene reduction in fababeans.
- Recommendation The authors concluded that pea rhizobia should not reduce fababean fixation and yield when specific inoculum is applied.