Claim · model-written summary
Soil total P, available P and inorganic P were higher in treatments with organic amendments than with nonorganic amendments in maize field trials.
- Treatment
- organic amendmentse0
- Outcome
- soil total P, available P, inorganic Pe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- nonorganic amendmentse0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the soil total P, available P, inorganic P, and organic P recovered from the treatments with the organic amendments were higher compared with the nonorganic amendments”
t0“Zea mays l.”
Title
Huck Ywih Ch’ng; Ahmed Osumanu Haruna; Nik Muhamad Nik Abdul Majid; et al. Italian Journal of Agronomy 2019. doi:10.4081/ija.2019.1107
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Soil organic P was higher in treatments with organic amendments than with nonorganic amendments in maize field trials.
- Intervention effect Availability of soil macro-nutrients was higher in treatments with organic amendments in the first and second field trials.
- Intervention effect Zea mays L. yield was higher in treatments with organic amendments in the first and second field trials.
- Intervention effect Amending chemical fertilisers with organic amendments had a larger residual effect than chemical fertilisers only in maize.
- Recommendation Amending chemical fertilisers with organic amendments can be used to ameliorate P fixation of acid soils and so improve maize production.