Claim · model-written summary
Aeration porosity and density had no interaction effect on analyzed variables.
- Treatment
- interaction between the factorse0
- Outcome
- analyzed variablese0
- Direction
- did not have an effecte0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between the factors did not have an effect on the analyzed variables.”
t0“Gas exchanges and growth of maize as affected by aeration porosity and soil compaction”
Title
Gas exchanges and growth of maize as affected by aeration porosity and soil compaction
Francisca Gleiciane da Silva; Raimundo Nonato de Assis Junior; Rosilene Oliveira Mesquita; et al. Ciência Agronômica/Revista ciência agronômica 2020. doi:10.5935/1806-6690.20200043
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Aeration porosity significantly affected photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, SPAD, height and biomass with quadratic fits.
- Intervention effect The highest aeration porosity reduced conductance by 11%.
- Intervention effect The highest aeration porosity reduced photosynthesis by 7%.
- Intervention effect The highest aeration porosity reduced SPAD by 6.4%.
- Intervention effect Aeration porosity below 0.10 m3 m-3 did not significantly reduce gas exchange or growth.
- Intervention effect At 1.7 Mg m-3 density photosynthesis and SPAD were higher.
- Intervention effect At 1.7 Mg m-3 density chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids were higher.
- Intervention effect At 1.7 Mg m-3 density biomass and leaf area did not increase.