Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hydropriming with 22nd Nov sowing and 16 hrs soaking gave a similar, higher test weight of wheat (43.33g).

A claim from Effect of hydropriming and different sowing dates on growth and yield attributes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydropriming with 22nd Nov sowing and 16 hrs soaking gave a similar, higher test weight of wheat (43.33g).

Treatment
[hydropriming] 22nd Nov + 16 hrse1
Outcome
test weighte2
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
43.33ge2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–166
e1

“The highest germination percentage was recorded at T4 [hydropriming] 22nd Nov + 16 hrs. ( 94.04%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–375
e2

“test weight (43.33g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–614
e3

“recorded similar result in same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–706

Title

Effect of hydropriming and different sowing dates on growth and yield attributes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

S. S. Patra; B. Mehera; S. Rout; et al. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2016. doi:10.31018/jans.v8i2.907

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-8a2d3329bb1806e2625e00d45d261d05fce6c0706aec584e7df68a9eb0baefa3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.